Understanding Falun Gong and Human Rights

falun gong, a spiritual practice, yet it represents human rights violations

FALUN GONG IS NOT A FAITH

THE RANK OF ENGLISH ARAB - THE CHINOOK - IS WAY BEYOND THE PLATFORM OF TORTURE

THE RANK OF CHINESE ARAB IS NOT BEYOND TORTURE IT DEALS WITH TORTURE AND PLAYS GAMES OF SADISM AND MORE BUT HAS NOT YET ATTAINED A RANK THAT WHICH IS CLEAR PATH BEYOMD TORTURE.

THE STUDY OF YIN AND YANG HOLDS MANY TRUTHS FOR ALL OF US BUT IS NOT A FAITH IS A FORM. IT IS NOT A FAITH AS IT REGARDS THE FEMALE EQUAL TO THE MALE.

...

INCORPORATION INTO ENGLISH MALE BENEVOLENCE THE CHINESE practice of Falun Gong (GRANTING WOMEN RIGHTS ENGLISH WOMEN DO NOT HAVE) in Castle Park DID NOT LEAVE MANY OPTIONS OPEN.

clearly

1. THE ENGLISH MALE HAD TO WIN ANY REAL OR IMAGINARY WAR WITH THIS CHINESE PRACTICE,

2. THE ABSOLUTE SUPERIORITY OF ANY OF THE ESTABLISHED FAITHS OVER SOME CHINESE EXCERCISE ROUTINE FROM THE REALM OF TORTURE COULD NOT DETERMINE FACTORS THAT MATTER IN THE LAND

THE ONLY WAY BOBBY COULD INCORPORATE FAKUB GONG INTO THE DAILY WORLD OF CASTLE PARK WAS was to exclude the female from A FAIR FEW RIGHTS ORDINARILY GRANTED INCLUDING FEMALE sexual pleasures and that he did not want to do.

he considered THAT is an immense Human Rights violation.

Islam grants the most benevolent way of rights to the female and that is through the most paternalistic law of favouritism essentially called

SHARIA LAW

In Islam it is clear and we all learn: the female of the species is at THE service of the male and not the other way round ...

That is the true way of service and there is no other way regardless of Christian evictors from Bristol city council , or KLU KLUX KLAN opposing Christian court structures.

There is not much difference between a KLU KLUX KLAN victim and a FALUN GONG victim.

BOTH represent a Christian wrong that which riles the law abiding citizen of the ISLAM faith to such extent He wants TO JUST SIMPLY BURN OR CASTRATE OR SIMILAR the one allowing the female the Christian MALE's right (the allow - er) alive and to death . SOME WANT TO HARM THE FEMALE

no male is to allow the female the Christian male's rights in body

(She has not bits)

and to prove that is true: those disobeying this law NEver pass to paraplegiA care (this does or does not include homelessness I believe is one of the questions here) - and become regarded as animals by the rest of the social structures - AS ANIMALS DO NOT PASSTO PARAPLEGIA CARE

...

The LAW,

The LAW of MALE TRUTH,

The ONLY WAY of LAW DEMANDS AND COMMANDS the male is righted higher than the female

• The male has rights in reproduction the female has not

• The male has more rights in law

• the male has rights in body

• The male has true rights to land

• The male has rights to bet

• The male has sexual rights additional to the female

• The male has ownership rights additional to the female

• &

• not least to mention the male has a hell of a lot more rights on the street IN COMPARISON TO the female

bobbys rights is A powerful movement for justice.

Supporter

"

there is a 'gorilla' friend saying :

he grew a fanny that big we heard it scrape the ground

all these rights assume to mean support structures attached

for example the male who bets is supported in his betting in a way he understands what betting actually means

and

a female WHO PLACES A BET does not & never will understand ABOUT BETTING FULLY AND SOME facets such as calculation of chance attached and more WILL NEVER BE CLEAR TO HER

the female does not have support structure for these kinds of activities regardless of what one's view is about male service

klu klux klan

IS FALUN GONG ABLE TO STOP THE KLU KLUX KLAN STYLE OF Dissection of its practitioners is a good question yet undetermined,

but some factors are for certain: it is not a faith as it allows the female to consider herself equal to the male and is therefore automatically excluded from the rank of faiths; as it has not understood the female is at the service of the male being the basic and fundamental element of faith.

so it will never be a faith

male Human Rights

Explore the unique insights on Falun Gong and understand the view: the practice of falun gong violates male rights and raises male human rights issues.

DEFINITION FO MALE HUMAN RIGHTS INCORPORATES THE FACT WE ALL UNDERSTAND THE FEMALE IS AT THE SERVICE OF THE MALE.

THAT SET UP AUTOMATICALLY GRANTS THE MALE HIGHER RIGHTS AND PRIVILAGES TO THE FEMALE.

Falun Gong DISRESPECTS THIS AND allows the female rights she does not have , it deludes the female into believing she has those rights at some IMMENSE cost to a third party i.e. the male, WHO THEN HAS TO SANCTION ALREADY EXISTING RIGHTS OF THE FEMALE

These teachings do fly in the face of the male's human rights and those practicing Falun Gong are to understand it is for the male those have been granted not the female and if the female persistently badgers the male for her rights to Falun Gong she looses her right to orgasm and will have to accept she only ever pretends to orgasm.

Female orgasm is a profound human right granted to all including Christian women - the squirming worms

www.whatthefckisaneunuch.pro

The principles of Falun Gong highlight the importance of freedom and dignity for all individuals, making it a vital topic in today's human rights discussions.

the female who chooses her own importance over and above the species' ability to orgasm in female is an eunuch in conscience.

Those females advocating Falun Gong for females are essentially advocating EUNUCH as a life form for the female of the species and are therefore EUNUCHS in female conscience

An EUNUCH is a SUB HUMAN life form and therefore fails all tests of HUMAN RIGHTS

★★★★★

★★★★★

the organ robbing and castration stories of falun gong are to represent the actions of castrating eunuchs

Falun Gong & THAI CHI

Explore the human rights challenges faced by Falun Gong practitioners.

Human Rights Advocacy

BOBBY'S RIGHTS

remained unimpacted by the practice of FALUN GONG in the park, but the female looses more rights than one is able to sum up amongst which IS the female's right to orgasm.

it is somewhat difficult to see the connection but there is one

Somebody made the following comparison/analogy

"leave the dog outside"

OR

"allow it in"

allowing it in will be at the cost of the guests not being allowed out of the living room.

Most thought the guest should have the free roam of the house and the dog was to stay outside - for crying out loud's sake -

... and that allowing the dog in despite the utter inconvenience caused to the guests simply and merely indicated some weakness, which had arisen in the care career of looking after the dog. and whilst the dog rights were important the guests comfort mattered more.

the anology interpreted:

if you allow the female the same right of roaming the body as you allow the male (dog allowed in) - which is what falun gong does is over righting the female . that is at a huge cost of something rather pleasurable such as having guest .

another way of putting it;

there are always secrets males agree never to tell the female. for example round a round table. should you tell the wife, the daughter, sister, lover or aunt some of the roundtables secrets you will be automatically excluded. that is simple. the roundtable will noow have to generate secrets of higher importance and exclude the female form knowing those.

this give and take is not rocket science.

secrets of the body very much belong in this category and the male is not to tell the female those and

THE LAW OF ISLAM SAYS A WOMAN IS NEVER TO HIT A MALE EVEN OUT OF SELF DEFENCE, BUT TAI CHI TEACHES OTHERWISE AND THERFORE CAN NEVER BE A FAITH

IT MAY BE VERY STYLISH BUT IT IS NOT A FAITH AS PROOF IS PRE OCCUPIED BY LINEAGE RATHER THAN MATTER OF FAITH

Predict the future by creating it

You didn’t come this far to stop

Write a short text about your service

Write a short text about your service

Write a short text about your service

FALUN GONG AND RIGHTS TO LAND

Dedicated to promoting UNDERSTANDING; Falun Gong DELUDES WOMEN INTO BELEIVING THEY HAVE RIGHTS TO LAND. ORDINARILY WOMEN DO NOT HAVE RIGHTS TO LAND. ONLY WOMEN IN ISLAM HAVE RIGHTS TO LAND AND A HOMELESS PERSON WILL PICK UP A DELUSIONAL GRANTING OF LANDRIGHTS TO CHRISTIAN WOMEN

THAT IS SOMEWHAT SIMILAR TO SAYING TO WOMEN:

"YOU NOW MAY HAVE 5 LEGS"

WOMEN MAY NOT HAVE FIVE LEGS THEY MAY ONLY HAVE TWO LEGS AS PRESCRIBED.

150+

15

Community Support

Join Us

A HOMELESS PERSON'S PLATFORM OF RIGHTS TO PROPERTY IS BROKEN

CHRISTIAN WOMEN HAVE NO RIGHT TO LAND, ONLY WOMEN IN ISLAM WHO DEDICATE THEIR LIVES AND ENTIRETY TO THEIR MEN MAY HAVE LAND RIGHTS AS GRANTED BY THEIR MEN

advocating for MALE land rights, we strive to create awareness and support for these vital issues.